replacement and can't use it anymore. At this point I feel comfortable
taken the writeoff. The charity is the one setting what they feel is
the value. Same as in a "kept" car donation. If they can set the
value for a car, then the same logic suggests that this charity can set
the value (to them) of the equipment. Basically, I wanted to see if
others saw the logic in the argument.
------------------------------------
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this transmission, any tax advice contained herein, forwarded with or attached to this message was not and is not intended to be used, nor may it be relied upon or used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) the avoidance of any tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax transaction or tax-related matters that may be addressed herein.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/taxchat/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/taxchat/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:taxchat-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:taxchat-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
taxchat-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
