Custom Search

28 Oktober 2008

[forum-pajak] Dibutuhkan Segera Tax Supervisor

Yth Rekan2 Forum Pajak,

Sebuah Perusahaan Air Mineral yang sedang berkembang membutuhan segera
seorang tenaga kerja untuk mengisi posisi Tax Supervisor dengan kualifikasi
sbb :
1. Pria/Wanita usia max 28 thn
2. Berdomisili di Depok, Tangerang, Cimanggis dan sekitarnya
3. Menguasi MS Office
4. Mempunya Sertifikasi Brever A or B (lebih diutamakan)
5. Menguasai pembuatan Laporan Pajak SPT Masa dan Tahunan.
6. Mampu bekerja secara mandiri maupun Team Work

Bagi rekan2 yang berminat dan memenuhi kualifikasi di atas dapat mengirimkan
CV ke alamat email :
Andry_junaidy@yahoo.com

Jabat Erat,
Suhardy Suryadi


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

DISCLAIMER:
Please consult a professional if you require legal advice or other expert assistance. Although this discussion group is designed to provide you with accurate and authoritative information about the subjects covered, it is published with the understanding that Forum Pajak nor its member are engaged in rendering legal, business, or other professional advice. For more information, please visit www.forumpajak.com or send email to subscribe@forumpajak.com to subscribe. Send your advices or comments to redaksifp@forumpajak.com.
============================================
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [forum-pajak] Undangan Seminar Dari DJP Pusat

kalau yamg ngundang DJP pasti gratis dan biasanya lewat AR
tgl 16 kemarin saya dapat undangan dari Kanwil LTO dan dilewatkan AR trus gratis....


--- On Wed, 10/29/08, aryanto budi <aryantobn@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: aryanto budi <aryantobn@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [forum-pajak] Undangan Seminar Dari DJP Pusat
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 8:57 AM

iya abaikan saja Bu, itu bohong. Padahal menurut informasi yang saya dapat acaranya juga tidak jelas, dan penyelenggaranya justru bukan dari kalangan DJP.

regards,

Aryanto Budi Nugroho

____________ _________ _________ __
From: HENDRA WIJANA <hendra_wijana@ yahoo.com>
To: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com; Maria <mherina@yahoo. com.sg>
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:20:15 AM
Subject: Re: [forum-pajak] Undangan Seminar Dari DJP Pusat

Sudah sering bu, diabaikan saja.

--- On Tue, 10/28/08, Maria <mherina@yahoo. com.sg> wrote:

From: Maria <mherina@yahoo. com.sg>
Subject: [forum-pajak] Undangan Seminar Dari DJP Pusat
To: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com
Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 10:44 AM

Kami menerima telepon dari petugas yang mengaku dari DJP Pusat, awalnya
mencari komisaris kami, yang kemudian ternyata mengajukan undangan ikut
seminar mengenai KUP baru dan sunset policy tanggal 11 Nopember 2008 di
Hotel akasia, yang menurut info akan dihadiri oleh Dirjen. Biaya Rp 1,7
juta/ orang.
Yang membingungkan kami adalah terkesan kami dipaksa untuk harus ikut.
Menurut AR kami, mungkin itu sebenarnya hanya mengatasnamakan DJP Pusat
saya, jadi diabaikan saja.

Mohon petunjuk dari tekan-rekan apakah ada yang mengalami hal ini juga.
Dan bagaimana mengatasinya.

Tks sebelumnya

Maria

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

DISCLAIMER:
Please consult a professional if you require legal advice or other expert assistance. Although this discussion group is designed to provide you with accurate and authoritative information about the subjects covered, it is published with the understanding that Forum Pajak nor its member are engaged in rendering legal, business, or other professional advice. For more information, please visit www.forumpajak.com or send email to subscribe@forumpajak.com to subscribe. Send your advices or comments to redaksifp@forumpajak.com.
============================================
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[forum-pajak] PPh psl 23

Dear all,

Mohon yang mempunyai format spt pph masa terbaru

Regards,

rachmat


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

DISCLAIMER:
Please consult a professional if you require legal advice or other expert assistance. Although this discussion group is designed to provide you with accurate and authoritative information about the subjects covered, it is published with the understanding that Forum Pajak nor its member are engaged in rendering legal, business, or other professional advice. For more information, please visit www.forumpajak.com or send email to subscribe@forumpajak.com to subscribe. Send your advices or comments to redaksifp@forumpajak.com.
============================================
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[taxchat] OFF TOPIC: The Weather, & Chocolate

Well, it's still hot out here.  96 degrees today !  As I write (6:00 p.m.), it is still 93 degrees outside.  Where is autumn ?  I demand cooler weather !!!
 
Anyway, I hereby officially renew my promise to make chocolate, as soon as the weather cools down some and I can ship it without it getting all grossed out.
 
And how is your weather ?
 
Cheers,
JoJo
..............................................................................................................................................................
Music:  
http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo * http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog:  http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/


 
__._,_.___

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this transmission, any tax advice contained herein, forwarded with or attached to this message was not and is not intended to be used, nor may it be relied upon or used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) the avoidance of any tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax transaction or tax-related matters that may be addressed herein.




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [taxchat] Re: Bad Client Question

No, not the partner -- my ex-client !!! What an idiot !!!

The atty from PrePaid Legal called me back and we had a good laugh over it.
He basically advised that I go with the flow ... my ex-client's atty will
probably figure out at the deposition that I am a less than friendly
witness, and not call me for trial.

The ex-client honestly does not believe that he has done anything wrong,
which is probably why he doesn't figure I might mind helping him out. When
I told him that paying relative "A" and issuing the W-2 to relative "B" in
order for relative "A" to avoid paying income taxes was illegal, he said he
saw nothing wrong with it and fully intended to continue doing so. (It was
at this point that I decided to get rid of him after I finished the
bookkeeping project, and I also refused to prepare his corporate taxes.) As
it turned out, he stiffed me for a few hundred $ when I did his personal T/R
and that precipitated ending our business relationship even before the
bookkeeping project was done.

Cheers,
JoJo
............................................................................
............................................................................
......
Music: http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo *
http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog: http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/


-----Original Message-----
From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf
Of Clarisse
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 5:34 PM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [taxchat] Re: Bad Client Question


Wow JoJo,

Who sent the subponea - the partner? I would think that the ex-client
would be smart enough to stay away from you! Oh, silly me, stupid is
as stupid does.

Well, get your notes and files in order and watch the show!

Good luck with everything, I am sure that you do not have anything to
worry about that is why we hire lawyers.


--- In taxchat@yahoogroups.com, "Kate M Coyne" <KateMc@...> wrote:
>
> Pretty unbelievable!! Maybe he won't want anything to do with you
in court if he knows you are not going to be favorable to him.
>
> Kate
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: JoJo Zawawi
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:47 PM
> Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
> Well check this out. I responded to this guy's e-mail, telling
him I wasn't taking on new clients etc. So he called me on the phone
yesterday, telling me that what he wanted was for me to write up some
sort of affidavit/declaration on his behalf -- he had fired his
partner, and his partner is suing him. He wanted me to testify that
the books were messed up when I took them over (they were) and that
it was his partner's fault. Now, I cannot testify that it was his
partner's fault, because I never observed his partner (or anybody
else) doing the books. I only have my ex-client's word that it was
his partner's fault. So I told him this, and declined.
>
> What happens today ? Somebody showed up at my door with a
subpoena ! (I wasn't home.) The process server then left me a
voicemail telling me that he has a subpoena, and to please call him.
>
> I would just love to get up on that stand and tell them how my ex-
client was the unethical one, paying the wrong person in order to
unlawfully avoid income taxes, and so on....
>
> Actually, I don't want to have anything to do with them. I've
just called an attorney (I finally get to use PrePaid Legal !) to get
his advice first.
>
> Can you believe this **** ?
>
> Cheers,
> JoJo
> ..................................................................
......................................................................
......................
> Music: http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo *
http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
> Blog: http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of JoJo Zawawi
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 2:46 PM
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
> That sounds perfect. I wanted the least troublesome route. I'm
not interested in having further friction or whatever.
>
> As a note to Arnie, I DO agree that people can (and do) change
for the better. I just don't think that this guy did, and so I feel
he is dangerous at best.
>
> Cheers,
> JoJo
> ..................................................................
......................................................................
......................
> Music: http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo *
http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
> Blog: http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of Jenkins LawFirm
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 12:00 PM
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
> Then just respond briefly, a polite 'thanks but no thanks', I
would only say, I'm not able to take on any work from you due to my
current workload.
>
> KC Jenkins
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM, JoJo Zawawi <kuchekesha@...>
wrote:
>
>
> I definitely won't have him back again -- I'm not talking about
just not reporting some income or something. A couple of examples:
>
> 1. He ruined something in a truck (something to do with the
engine, and which would cost a LOT to fix) and figured out a way to
mickey-mouse it so it would look and act perfect temporarily, and
then traded it in for a new car, never mentioning the problem.
>
> 2. He was employing one of his relatives, but the paycheck was
going to another one of his relatives who does not work for him (who
had much lower income), to aviod relative # 1 having any tax
liability.
>
> There was more. I really do not trust this guy. He is shady,
shifty and shiftless. Or something like that. I consider him
dangerous, especially these days with extra IRS scrutiny and fines
and so on !
>
> I think I'll go with the "My practice has changed and I'm not
taking on clients right now" approach.
>
> Thanks, all !
>
> Cheers,
> JoJo
>
>
> ................................................................
......................................................................
........................
> Music: http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo *
http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
> Blog:
http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Chuck Warman
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:56 AM
>
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
> I agree with Kate...."illegal" is the operative word here. In
fact, I'd go a little farther, telling him that you're glad that you
can be on friendly terms now, but that it would probably not be in
the best interest of either of you to take on his work again.
>
>
>
> Suppose you hire a babysitter, and her boyfriend comes over and
smacks your kid around. You can forgive her, and ultimately you can
even have a friendly relationship. But are you going to let her
babysit your kid again?
>
>
>
>
>
> Chuck Warman, CPA
> Wichita Falls, TX
> -------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Kate M Coyne
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:45 AM
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
>
> Arnie,
>
> I would normally be with you on this except JoJo's comment "I
started to find out that he was doing this and that illegal stuff".
Get away from this guy. Remember what your Mother said? If you hang
around with the wrong crowd people will think you are doing the same
things they do. I would not put my reputation on the line, it's
worth more than the income.
>
>
>
> Kate
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Arnold M. Socol
>
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
>
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:56 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
>
> I know that most of you will disagree, but hear is my response
>
>
>
> I personally would be more open about it. Maybe the X-Rude
client has seen the light and now respects the quality of work you
have provided. I would give these people the opportunity under "my"
rules and see what happens. Quote him a retainer fee in advance for
the service politely, including the unpaid balance. If questioned
about the advance, the answer is that is my policy whenever there has
been any problem in the past. If he accepts, you have only gained.
If he declines, then no loss. Your loss is not being more open to
the opportunity of new business, especially during what may be an
extended down turn in the economy. Just check today's stock market -
its "limit down" circuit breakers have been triggered. As a
financial advisor I have thoughts on that topic as well.
>
>
>
> Arnie
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Kate M Coyne
>
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
>
> Sent: 10/24/2008 9:38 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
>
> I would respond (my husband wouldn't even respond) and tell
him something to the effect that I am not accepting any additional
clients and I am unable to take on any additional work.
>
>
>
> Good luck,
>
> Kate
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: JoJo Zawawi
>
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
>
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:10 PM
>
> Subject: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
>
> About 1-1/2 years ago, I had a bookkeeping / tax client
that was a total pain in the behind, and as we got to know each other
better, I started to find out that he was doing this and that illegal
stuff, and I wanted no part of it. It worked out at that time that I
did not have to fire him, because he fired me after I prepared his
tax return and charged him tax prep rates, not bookkeeping rates. He
stiffed me about $ 200 on the bill (paid bookkeeping rates for the
time spent) and was very, very rude, and even threatened me that "his
new bookkeeper will probably find lots of mistakes and he will bill
me for it all", etc. Needless to say, I never heard back from him.
>
>
>
> Today he sent me an e-mail, apologizing and asking me for
advice regarding his business partner. (What advice, I don't know.
And hello, I'm not a lawyer !)
>
>
>
> Of course, I want no part of him.
>
>
> The question: Do I respond politely, telling him I am
busy ? Or do I not even respond ?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> JoJo
> ..........................................................
......................................................................
..............................
> Music: http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo *
http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
> Blog:
http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/
>

------------------------------------

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this
transmission, any tax advice contained herein, forwarded with or attached to
this message was not and is not intended to be used, nor may it be relied
upon or used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) the avoidance of any
tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or
local tax law provisions, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any tax transaction or tax-related matters that may be
addressed herein.
Yahoo! Groups Links


------------------------------------

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this transmission, any tax advice contained herein, forwarded with or attached to this message was not and is not intended to be used, nor may it be relied upon or used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) the avoidance of any tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax transaction or tax-related matters that may be addressed herein.
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/taxchat/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/taxchat/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:taxchat-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:taxchat-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
taxchat-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[taxchat] Re: Bad Client Question

Wow JoJo,

Who sent the subponea - the partner? I would think that the ex-client
would be smart enough to stay away from you! Oh, silly me, stupid is
as stupid does.

Well, get your notes and files in order and watch the show!

Good luck with everything, I am sure that you do not have anything to
worry about that is why we hire lawyers.


--- In taxchat@yahoogroups.com, "Kate M Coyne" <KateMc@...> wrote:
>
> Pretty unbelievable!! Maybe he won't want anything to do with you
in court if he knows you are not going to be favorable to him.
>
> Kate
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: JoJo Zawawi
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:47 PM
> Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
> Well check this out. I responded to this guy's e-mail, telling
him I wasn't taking on new clients etc. So he called me on the phone
yesterday, telling me that what he wanted was for me to write up some
sort of affidavit/declaration on his behalf -- he had fired his
partner, and his partner is suing him. He wanted me to testify that
the books were messed up when I took them over (they were) and that
it was his partner's fault. Now, I cannot testify that it was his
partner's fault, because I never observed his partner (or anybody
else) doing the books. I only have my ex-client's word that it was
his partner's fault. So I told him this, and declined.
>
> What happens today ? Somebody showed up at my door with a
subpoena ! (I wasn't home.) The process server then left me a
voicemail telling me that he has a subpoena, and to please call him.
>
> I would just love to get up on that stand and tell them how my ex-
client was the unethical one, paying the wrong person in order to
unlawfully avoid income taxes, and so on....
>
> Actually, I don't want to have anything to do with them. I've
just called an attorney (I finally get to use PrePaid Legal !) to get
his advice first.
>
> Can you believe this **** ?
>
> Cheers,
> JoJo
> ..................................................................
......................................................................
......................
> Music: http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo *
http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
> Blog: http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of JoJo Zawawi
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 2:46 PM
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
> That sounds perfect. I wanted the least troublesome route. I'm
not interested in having further friction or whatever.
>
> As a note to Arnie, I DO agree that people can (and do) change
for the better. I just don't think that this guy did, and so I feel
he is dangerous at best.
>
> Cheers,
> JoJo
> ..................................................................
......................................................................
......................
> Music: http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo *
http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
> Blog: http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of Jenkins LawFirm
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 12:00 PM
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
> Then just respond briefly, a polite 'thanks but no thanks', I
would only say, I'm not able to take on any work from you due to my
current workload.
>
> KC Jenkins
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM, JoJo Zawawi <kuchekesha@...>
wrote:
>
>
> I definitely won't have him back again -- I'm not talking about
just not reporting some income or something. A couple of examples:
>
> 1. He ruined something in a truck (something to do with the
engine, and which would cost a LOT to fix) and figured out a way to
mickey-mouse it so it would look and act perfect temporarily, and
then traded it in for a new car, never mentioning the problem.
>
> 2. He was employing one of his relatives, but the paycheck was
going to another one of his relatives who does not work for him (who
had much lower income), to aviod relative # 1 having any tax
liability.
>
> There was more. I really do not trust this guy. He is shady,
shifty and shiftless. Or something like that. I consider him
dangerous, especially these days with extra IRS scrutiny and fines
and so on !
>
> I think I'll go with the "My practice has changed and I'm not
taking on clients right now" approach.
>
> Thanks, all !
>
> Cheers,
> JoJo
>
>
> ................................................................
......................................................................
........................
> Music: http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo *
http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
> Blog:
http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Chuck Warman
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:56 AM
>
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
> I agree with Kate...."illegal" is the operative word here. In
fact, I'd go a little farther, telling him that you're glad that you
can be on friendly terms now, but that it would probably not be in
the best interest of either of you to take on his work again.
>
>
>
> Suppose you hire a babysitter, and her boyfriend comes over and
smacks your kid around. You can forgive her, and ultimately you can
even have a friendly relationship. But are you going to let her
babysit your kid again?
>
>
>
>
>
> Chuck Warman, CPA
> Wichita Falls, TX
> -------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Kate M Coyne
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:45 AM
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
>
> Arnie,
>
> I would normally be with you on this except JoJo's comment "I
started to find out that he was doing this and that illegal stuff".
Get away from this guy. Remember what your Mother said? If you hang
around with the wrong crowd people will think you are doing the same
things they do. I would not put my reputation on the line, it's
worth more than the income.
>
>
>
> Kate
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Arnold M. Socol
>
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
>
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:56 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
>
> I know that most of you will disagree, but hear is my response
>
>
>
> I personally would be more open about it. Maybe the X-Rude
client has seen the light and now respects the quality of work you
have provided. I would give these people the opportunity under "my"
rules and see what happens. Quote him a retainer fee in advance for
the service politely, including the unpaid balance. If questioned
about the advance, the answer is that is my policy whenever there has
been any problem in the past. If he accepts, you have only gained.
If he declines, then no loss. Your loss is not being more open to
the opportunity of new business, especially during what may be an
extended down turn in the economy. Just check today's stock market -
its "limit down" circuit breakers have been triggered. As a
financial advisor I have thoughts on that topic as well.
>
>
>
> Arnie
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Kate M Coyne
>
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
>
> Sent: 10/24/2008 9:38 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
>
> I would respond (my husband wouldn't even respond) and tell
him something to the effect that I am not accepting any additional
clients and I am unable to take on any additional work.
>
>
>
> Good luck,
>
> Kate
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: JoJo Zawawi
>
> To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
>
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:10 PM
>
> Subject: [taxchat] Bad Client Question
>
>
>
> About 1-1/2 years ago, I had a bookkeeping / tax client
that was a total pain in the behind, and as we got to know each other
better, I started to find out that he was doing this and that illegal
stuff, and I wanted no part of it. It worked out at that time that I
did not have to fire him, because he fired me after I prepared his
tax return and charged him tax prep rates, not bookkeeping rates. He
stiffed me about $ 200 on the bill (paid bookkeeping rates for the
time spent) and was very, very rude, and even threatened me that "his
new bookkeeper will probably find lots of mistakes and he will bill
me for it all", etc. Needless to say, I never heard back from him.
>
>
>
> Today he sent me an e-mail, apologizing and asking me for
advice regarding his business partner. (What advice, I don't know.
And hello, I'm not a lawyer !)
>
>
>
> Of course, I want no part of him.
>
>
> The question: Do I respond politely, telling him I am
busy ? Or do I not even respond ?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> JoJo
> ..........................................................
......................................................................
..............................
> Music: http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo *
http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
> Blog:
http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/
>

------------------------------------

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this transmission, any tax advice contained herein, forwarded with or attached to this message was not and is not intended to be used, nor may it be relied upon or used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) the avoidance of any tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax transaction or tax-related matters that may be addressed herein.
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/taxchat/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/taxchat/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:taxchat-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:taxchat-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
taxchat-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: [taxchat] Husband-Wife LLC & OIH

If you look at it from the perspective of the "check the box" rules, the IRS interpretation is consistent. By default an LLC with more than one member must file a partnership return. My question is why lawyers are so quick to recommend forming corporations and LLCs in situations where it is not clear that it is beneficial to the client.
 

From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Lynne Ayton
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 5:20 PM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [taxchat] Husband-Wife LLC & OIH

after reading all of this thread, it seems to me IF irs really wants to "simplify" things, h/w reporting a sched C would be the way to go whether its an LLC or not.  just the reduction of paperwork makes sense ... but who says irs makes sense ...
lynne

Mel Wolfson wrote:



It seems that Gear Up, NATP agree on this. I heard the same mentioned by a speaker from NSTP at the most recent IRS forum. Logically, it makes sense that if the spouses are operating as one entity recognized as such by state law, they should report their income in a manner that reflects this.

__._,_.___

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this transmission, any tax advice contained herein, forwarded with or attached to this message was not and is not intended to be used, nor may it be relied upon or used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) the avoidance of any tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax transaction or tax-related matters that may be addressed herein.




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

Hey, then while you're at it, have prepaid legal get your money for you!!!  What a NERVE he has!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:01 PM
Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

Not to mention that he also stiffed me on a substantial portion of my bill when I did his tax return (the last service I ever did for him) -- several hundred $.
 
What a jack*** !
 
We'll see what the PrePaid Legal guy has to say.  I'm hoping the same thing as you mentioned....
 
Cheers,
JoJo
..............................................................................................................................................................
Music:  
http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo * http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog:  http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/


-----Original Message-----
From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Kate M Coyne
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 5:00 PM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

Pretty unbelievable!!  Maybe he won't want anything to do with you in court if he knows you are not going to be favorable to him.
 
Kate
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

Well check this out.  I responded to this guy's e-mail, telling him I wasn't taking on new clients etc.  So he called me on the phone yesterday, telling me that what he wanted was for me to write up some sort of affidavit/declaration on his behalf -- he had fired his partner, and his partner is suing him.  He wanted me to testify that the books were messed up when I took them over (they were) and that it was his partner's fault.  Now, I cannot testify that it was his partner's fault, because I never observed his partner (or anybody else) doing the books.  I only have my ex-client's word that it was his partner's fault.  So I told him this, and declined.
 
What happens today ?  Somebody showed up at my door with a subpoena !  (I wasn't home.)  The process server then left me a voicemail telling me that he has a subpoena, and to please call him.
 
I would just love to get up on that stand and tell them how my ex-client was the unethical one, paying the wrong person in order to unlawfully avoid income taxes, and so on....
 
Actually, I don't want to have anything to do with them.  I've just called an attorney (I finally get to use PrePaid Legal !) to get his advice first.
 
Can you believe this **** ?
 
Cheers,
JoJo
..............................................................................................................................................................
Music:  
http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo * http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog:  http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/


-----Original Message-----
From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of JoJo Zawawi
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 2:46 PM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

That sounds perfect.  I wanted the least troublesome route.  I'm not interested in having further friction or whatever.
 
As a note to Arnie, I DO agree that people can (and do) change for the better.  I just don't think that this guy did, and so I feel he is dangerous at best.
 
Cheers,
JoJo
..............................................................................................................................................................
Music:  
http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo * http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog:  http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/


-----Original Message-----
From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Jenkins LawFirm
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 12:00 PM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

Then just respond briefly, a polite 'thanks but no thanks', I would only say, I'm not able to take on any work from you due to my current workload.
 
KC Jenkins

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM, JoJo Zawawi <kuchekesha@earthlink.net> wrote:

I definitely won't have him back again -- I'm not talking about just not reporting some income or something.  A couple of examples:
 
1.  He ruined something in a truck (something to do with the engine, and which would cost a LOT to fix) and figured out a way to mickey-mouse it so it would look and act perfect temporarily, and then traded it in for a new car, never mentioning the problem.
 
2.  He was employing one of his relatives, but the paycheck was going to another one of his relatives who does not work for him (who had much lower income), to aviod relative # 1 having any tax liability.
 
There was more.  I really do not trust this guy.  He is shady, shifty and shiftless.  Or something like that.  I consider him dangerous, especially these days with extra IRS scrutiny and fines and so on !
 
I think I'll go with the "My practice has changed and I'm not taking on clients right now" approach.
 
Thanks, all !

Cheers,
JoJo

..............................................................................................................................................................
Music:  
http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo * http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog:  http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/


-----Original Message-----
From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Chuck Warman
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:56 AM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

I agree with Kate...."illegal" is the operative word here.  In fact, I'd go a little farther, telling him that you're glad that you can be on friendly terms now, but that it would probably not be in the best interest of either of you to take on his work again. 

 

Suppose you hire a babysitter, and her boyfriend comes over and smacks your kid around.  You can forgive her, and ultimately you can even have a friendly relationship.  But are you going to let her babysit your kid again?

 

 

Chuck Warman,  CPA
Wichita Falls, TX
-------------------------------

 

 

 

From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kate M Coyne
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:45 AM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

 

Arnie,

I would normally be with you on this except JoJo's comment "I started to find out that he was doing this and that illegal stuff".  Get away from this guy.  Remember what your Mother said?  If you hang around with the wrong crowd people will think you are doing the same things they do.  I would not put my reputation on the line, it's worth more than the income.

 

Kate

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:56 AM

Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

 

I know that most of you will disagree, but hear is my response

 

I personally would be more open about it.  Maybe the X-Rude client has seen the light and now respects the quality of work you have provided.  I would give these people the opportunity under "my" rules and see what happens.  Quote him a retainer fee in advance for the service politely, including the unpaid balance.  If questioned about the advance, the answer is that is my policy whenever there has been any problem in the past. If he accepts, you have only gained.  If he declines, then no loss.  Your loss is not being more open to the opportunity of new business, especially during what may be an extended down turn in the economy.  Just check today's stock market - its "limit down" circuit breakers have been triggered.  As a financial advisor I have thoughts on that topic as well. 

 

Arnie

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Kate M Coyne

Sent: 10/24/2008 9:38 AM

Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

 

I would respond (my husband wouldn't even respond) and tell him something to the effect that I am not accepting any additional clients and I am unable to take on any additional work. 

 

Good luck,

Kate

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: JoJo Zawawi

Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:10 PM

Subject: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

 

About 1-1/2 years ago, I had a bookkeeping / tax client that was a total pain in the behind, and as we got to know each other better, I started to find out that he was doing this and that illegal stuff, and I wanted no part of it.  It worked out at that time that I did not have to fire him, because he fired me after I prepared his tax return and charged him tax prep rates, not bookkeeping rates.  He stiffed me about $ 200 on the bill (paid bookkeeping rates for the time spent) and was very, very rude, and even threatened me that "his new bookkeeper will probably find lots of mistakes and he will bill me for it all", etc.  Needless to say, I never heard back from him.

 

Today he sent me an e-mail, apologizing and asking me for advice regarding his business partner.  (What advice, I don't know.  And hello, I'm not a lawyer !)

 

Of course, I want no part of him.


The question:  Do I respond politely, telling him I am busy ?  Or do I not even respond ?

 

Cheers,

JoJo
..............................................................................................................................................................
Music:  
http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo * http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog:  http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/

 


__._,_.___

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this transmission, any tax advice contained herein, forwarded with or attached to this message was not and is not intended to be used, nor may it be relied upon or used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) the avoidance of any tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax transaction or tax-related matters that may be addressed herein.




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

Not to mention that he also stiffed me on a substantial portion of my bill when I did his tax return (the last service I ever did for him) -- several hundred $.
 
What a jack*** !
 
We'll see what the PrePaid Legal guy has to say.  I'm hoping the same thing as you mentioned....
 
Cheers,
JoJo
..............................................................................................................................................................
Music:  
http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo * http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog:  http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/


-----Original Message-----
From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Kate M Coyne
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 5:00 PM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

Pretty unbelievable!!  Maybe he won't want anything to do with you in court if he knows you are not going to be favorable to him.
 
Kate
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

Well check this out.  I responded to this guy's e-mail, telling him I wasn't taking on new clients etc.  So he called me on the phone yesterday, telling me that what he wanted was for me to write up some sort of affidavit/declaration on his behalf -- he had fired his partner, and his partner is suing him.  He wanted me to testify that the books were messed up when I took them over (they were) and that it was his partner's fault.  Now, I cannot testify that it was his partner's fault, because I never observed his partner (or anybody else) doing the books.  I only have my ex-client's word that it was his partner's fault.  So I told him this, and declined.
 
What happens today ?  Somebody showed up at my door with a subpoena !  (I wasn't home.)  The process server then left me a voicemail telling me that he has a subpoena, and to please call him.
 
I would just love to get up on that stand and tell them how my ex-client was the unethical one, paying the wrong person in order to unlawfully avoid income taxes, and so on....
 
Actually, I don't want to have anything to do with them.  I've just called an attorney (I finally get to use PrePaid Legal !) to get his advice first.
 
Can you believe this **** ?
 
Cheers,
JoJo
..............................................................................................................................................................
Music:  
http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo * http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog:  http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/


-----Original Message-----
From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of JoJo Zawawi
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 2:46 PM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

That sounds perfect.  I wanted the least troublesome route.  I'm not interested in having further friction or whatever.
 
As a note to Arnie, I DO agree that people can (and do) change for the better.  I just don't think that this guy did, and so I feel he is dangerous at best.
 
Cheers,
JoJo
..............................................................................................................................................................
Music:  
http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo * http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog:  http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/


-----Original Message-----
From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Jenkins LawFirm
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 12:00 PM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

Then just respond briefly, a polite 'thanks but no thanks', I would only say, I'm not able to take on any work from you due to my current workload.
 
KC Jenkins

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM, JoJo Zawawi <kuchekesha@earthlink.net> wrote:

I definitely won't have him back again -- I'm not talking about just not reporting some income or something.  A couple of examples:
 
1.  He ruined something in a truck (something to do with the engine, and which would cost a LOT to fix) and figured out a way to mickey-mouse it so it would look and act perfect temporarily, and then traded it in for a new car, never mentioning the problem.
 
2.  He was employing one of his relatives, but the paycheck was going to another one of his relatives who does not work for him (who had much lower income), to aviod relative # 1 having any tax liability.
 
There was more.  I really do not trust this guy.  He is shady, shifty and shiftless.  Or something like that.  I consider him dangerous, especially these days with extra IRS scrutiny and fines and so on !
 
I think I'll go with the "My practice has changed and I'm not taking on clients right now" approach.
 
Thanks, all !

Cheers,
JoJo

..............................................................................................................................................................
Music:  
http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo * http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog:  http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/


-----Original Message-----
From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Chuck Warman
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:56 AM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

I agree with Kate...."illegal" is the operative word here.  In fact, I'd go a little farther, telling him that you're glad that you can be on friendly terms now, but that it would probably not be in the best interest of either of you to take on his work again. 

 

Suppose you hire a babysitter, and her boyfriend comes over and smacks your kid around.  You can forgive her, and ultimately you can even have a friendly relationship.  But are you going to let her babysit your kid again?

 

 

Chuck Warman,  CPA
Wichita Falls, TX
-------------------------------

 

 

 

From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kate M Coyne
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:45 AM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

 

Arnie,

I would normally be with you on this except JoJo's comment "I started to find out that he was doing this and that illegal stuff".  Get away from this guy.  Remember what your Mother said?  If you hang around with the wrong crowd people will think you are doing the same things they do.  I would not put my reputation on the line, it's worth more than the income.

 

Kate

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:56 AM

Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

 

I know that most of you will disagree, but hear is my response

 

I personally would be more open about it.  Maybe the X-Rude client has seen the light and now respects the quality of work you have provided.  I would give these people the opportunity under "my" rules and see what happens.  Quote him a retainer fee in advance for the service politely, including the unpaid balance.  If questioned about the advance, the answer is that is my policy whenever there has been any problem in the past. If he accepts, you have only gained.  If he declines, then no loss.  Your loss is not being more open to the opportunity of new business, especially during what may be an extended down turn in the economy.  Just check today's stock market - its "limit down" circuit breakers have been triggered.  As a financial advisor I have thoughts on that topic as well. 

 

Arnie

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Kate M Coyne

Sent: 10/24/2008 9:38 AM

Subject: Re: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

 

I would respond (my husband wouldn't even respond) and tell him something to the effect that I am not accepting any additional clients and I am unable to take on any additional work. 

 

Good luck,

Kate

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: JoJo Zawawi

Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:10 PM

Subject: [taxchat] Bad Client Question

 

About 1-1/2 years ago, I had a bookkeeping / tax client that was a total pain in the behind, and as we got to know each other better, I started to find out that he was doing this and that illegal stuff, and I wanted no part of it.  It worked out at that time that I did not have to fire him, because he fired me after I prepared his tax return and charged him tax prep rates, not bookkeeping rates.  He stiffed me about $ 200 on the bill (paid bookkeeping rates for the time spent) and was very, very rude, and even threatened me that "his new bookkeeper will probably find lots of mistakes and he will bill me for it all", etc.  Needless to say, I never heard back from him.

 

Today he sent me an e-mail, apologizing and asking me for advice regarding his business partner.  (What advice, I don't know.  And hello, I'm not a lawyer !)

 

Of course, I want no part of him.


The question:  Do I respond politely, telling him I am busy ?  Or do I not even respond ?

 

Cheers,

JoJo
..............................................................................................................................................................
Music:  
http://www.myspace.com/jojozjojo * http://www.new.facebook.com/pages/JoJo-Zawawi/16883556821
Blog:  http://www.mysteriousperson.com/MYSTERIOUSPERSON/thezblog/

 


__._,_.___

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this transmission, any tax advice contained herein, forwarded with or attached to this message was not and is not intended to be used, nor may it be relied upon or used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) the avoidance of any tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax transaction or tax-related matters that may be addressed herein.




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
Custom Search