Pajak

06 November 2008

Re: [forum-pajak] Penandatangan SSP kepada pemungut

Pak Fuat,
menurut KMK-563/kmk.30/2003,
bapak sudah melakukan yang seharusnya & pemungut seharusnya menandatangani SSP.
sedangkan dalam PER 66/PB/2005 pada ps.4 "faktur pajak beserta SSP ditandatangani Wajib Pajak"
bukannya pemungut juga Wajib Pajak?
oleh karena itu pemungut harus menandatangani SSP tersebut.

--- On Thu, 11/6/08, Fuat Santoso <fuat73@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Fuat Santoso <fuat73@yahoo.com>
Subject: [forum-pajak] Penandatangan SSP kepada pemungut
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, November 6, 2008, 10:04 PM

dear all,

ditempat saya ada transaksi penjualan kepada pihak Depkominfo, sesuai dgn Keputusan Menteri Keuangan No.563/KMK.30/ 2003, SE-02/PJ.24/ 2005, SSP ditandatangani oleh Bendaharawan atau KPKN sebagai penyetor, tetapi pihak Depkominfo tidak mau menandatangani SSP tersebut karena menurut Depkominfo SSP harus ditandatangani oleh pihak penjual dengan mengacu pada Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Perbendaharaan PER 66/PB/2005 pada ps.4 "faktur pajak beserta SSP ditandatangani Wajib Pajak"

teman2 punya pengalaman transaksi dengan pemungut? sebenarnya siapakah yg hrs tanda tangan di SSP PPN (PPN setor sendiri oleh pemungut)

thx
fs

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

DISCLAIMER:
Please consult a professional if you require legal advice or other expert assistance. Although this discussion group is designed to provide you with accurate and authoritative information about the subjects covered, it is published with the understanding that Forum Pajak nor its member are engaged in rendering legal, business, or other professional advice. For more information, please visit www.forumpajak.com or send email to subscribe@forumpajak.com to subscribe. Send your advices or comments to redaksifp@forumpajak.com.
============================================
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [forum-pajak] Perbedaan tarif 100% lebih tinggi bagi yang tidak punya NPWP

Sahabat Falen yang sejiwa :)
Mungkin ini dikarenakan UU PPh telah mendelegasikan penentuan objek dan
tarif pajak PPh Pasal 4 (2) ke dalam PP. Bisa dilihat pada akhir ayat ini,
kalimat "yang diatur dengan atau berdasarkan PP".
sedangkan untuk PPh pasal 15 didelegasikan ke PerMenKeu.

Jadi punishment untuk WPDN yang belum punya NPWP mungkin akan kita dapatkan
di sana.

Regards

RMA
http://maskokilima.wordpress.com/

2008/11/7 falen_tina <falen_tina@yahoo.com>

> Sahabat-sahabat senafas dan sejiwa di forum pajak dan tax ina,
>
> Mau konfirmasi aja karena saya masih newbie dlm perpajakan.
> Seperti diketahui bahwa berdasarkan UU No.36 Th. 2008 untuk Pasal 22 ayat 3
> dan Pasal 26 telah diatur untuk WP yang tidak ber NPWP akan dikenakan PPh
> 100% lebih tinggi dari tarif normal.
> Untuk PPh Ps.26 tidak disebutkan perbedaan tarif antara yang berNPWP dan
> tidak, ini masih logis karena WP yang dipotong PPh PS.26 bukan residen
> Indonesia.
> Untuk PPh yang lainnya, misalkan Ps. 4(2) dan PPh Ps.15 kenapa tidak diatur
> perbedaan tarif ini ? padahal kalau menurut saya, bagi mereka yang tidak
> berNPWP juga mestinya dikenakan PPh 100% lebih tinggi seperti halnya diatur
> dlm PPh Ps.22 dan 23?
>
> Demikian, atas jawaban dan perhatian teman-teman semua para pakar pajak
> Indonesia, saya ucapkan terima kasih
>
> Salam
> Jagalah hati selalu
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

--
R M A

http://maskokilima.wordpress.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: [forum-pajak] Tanya tentang tarif 20% lebih tinggi

Pak Krisand
Mungkin bisa lebih dicermati lagi Psl 21 ayat 1 UU PPh 36 dan dihubungkan dgn ayat 5 dan menurut saya tarif lebih tinggi tesebut tetap dikenakan untuk PPh 21 Final misalnya PPh atas pesangon dan pensiun.

Sepanjang pengetahuan saya aturan mengenai pesangon masih menggunakan KMK-112/KMK.03/2001 dan junlak S-144/PJ.43/2003 & SE-536/PJ.313/2003 atau teman2 ada update-an terbaru.

Salam
Parlin

--- Pada Kam, 6/11/08, www.Pajak.net <marketing@pajak.net> menulis:

Dari: www.Pajak.net <marketing@pajak.net>
Topik: RE: [forum-pajak] Tanya tentang tarif 20% lebih tinggi
Kepada: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Tanggal: Kamis, 6 November, 2008, 9:25 AM

Jadi kesimpulannya tarif pajak 20% lebih tinggi berlaku juga untuk
perhitungan pesangon (PPh 21 final) ?
Apakah perhitungan pajak pesangon tahun 2009 tetap menggunakan tarif yang
lama ?
Thanks.

____________ _________ _________ _________ _
From: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com] On
Behalf Of kwiranata@yahoo. com
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 3:40 PM
To: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [forum-pajak] Tanya tentang tarif 20% lebih tinggi

Betul sekali.
Ini yang menyebabkan saya & rekan2 kantor bikin NPWP. Mengenai efek
perhitungan ke pph21 final, bagus pertanyaan nya :)

Wira

-----Original Message-----
From: "Pajak.Net" <marketing@pajak. net>

Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:22:44
To: <forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com>
Subject: [forum-pajak] Tanya tentang tarif 20% lebih tinggi

Dear all,

Untuk tarif pajak 20% lebih tinggi bagi WP yang tidak mempunyai NPWP, apakah
hal tsb berlaku untuk perhitungan PPh 21 final ?
Thanks.

Krishand

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

___________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! sekarang memiliki alamat Email baru.
Dapatkan nama yang selalu Anda inginkan di domain baru @ymail dan @rocketmail.
Cepat sebelum diambil orang lain!
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/id/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [forum-pajak] new comer

pph pasal 26 tarifnya 20%

________________________________
From: Johan Chrysler <mr.djonathan@yahoo.co.id>
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2008 1:28:04 PM
Subject: [forum-pajak] new comer

dear all,

seorang fresh graduate yang baru saja bekerja di sebuah perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang penginapan. kadang si owner juga bermain dengan saham luar negri.
jenis pajak apa saja yang saya hadapi?

terimakasih untuk jawabannya.. .

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
Nama baru untuk Anda!
Dapatkan nama yang selalu Anda inginkan di domain baru @ymail dan @rocketmail.
Cepat sebelum diambil orang lain!
http://mail. promotions. yahoo.com/ newdomains/ id/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[forum-pajak] Re Send : Tata Cara pembayaran Pajak hadiah

Dear all,
Maaf saya kirim lagi...
siapa tahu ada yang bisa kasih informasi ?

Kondisi terakhir setelah saya minta dirubah faktur pengiriman barang,
dgn deskripsi terpisah 5% admin dan 25% pajak.
Pihak advance tidak menyanggupi untuk serah terima barang.
Barang boleh diterima saya dgn syarat deskripsi faktur tertulis Admin 30%.
Jika deskripsi sesuai request saya, pihak advance meminta waktu 3 minggu, untuk diadakan pembayaran pajak dulu oleh advance.

----- Pesan Diteruskan ----
Dari: Mohamad Miftahudin <abu_afaren@yahoo.com>
Kepada: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Terkirim: Selasa, 28 Oktober, 2008 14:04:20
Topik: Tata Cara pembayaran Pajak hadiah

Dear all,

Salam kenal...
Saya ada case sbb :

1. 3-4 bulan yang lalu (Juni or July 08) saya membeli product kesehatan dari Advance berupa alat pijit.
2. Sekitar 10 hari yang lalu (14-15 Oktober 08) saya mendapat telp dari Advance pusat dari Ibu Lestari No Telp. 021-98299810 (kayaknya bukan telp kantor namun Nomor Hp Esia)
yang menyatakan bahwa saya mendapat Hadiah atas undian yang dilakukan pihak advance berupa Penyaring Air dgn Tipe WS 8804, dengan syarat saya harus membayar pajak atas hadiah 25% dan administrasi 5% dari Harga 8,7 jtan sebesar 2,6 jtan.
Berdasarkan keterangan Ibu Lestari Informasi pemenang ini tidak di publish, tapi hanya via telp langsung ke pemenang.
3. Tgl 23 Oktober 08 barang dikirim langsung oleh pihak advance, namun yang tertulis dalam nota adalah saya membayar administrasi 30% sebesar 2,6jt.
Tidak ada informasi terpisah antara pajak 25% dan administrasi 5%.
meskipun secara total bernilai 30% atau 2,6jt.

Saya sendiri kurang tahu apakah ini memang hadiah atau cara marketing untuk menawarkan barang.
Waktu itu saya sempet cek di beberapa counter advance memang harga barang tsb sebesar 8.7 juta.
Namun saya sendiri tidak tahu pasti apakah nilai ekonomis barang tsb adalah senilai itu.
Terus terang saya masih khawatir jangan2 barang tsb diskontinu atau stok lama yg secara nilai ekonomis seharga (seolah-olah) pajak yg harus bayarkan. Artinya uang yg saya keluarkan tidak diteruskan ke Kantor pajak, tapi diambil manfaatnya oleh penyelenggara.

Terlepas dari dugaan saya, saya ingin menanyakan :
1. Apakah ada unsur yg tidak baku dalam penyelanggaraan undian tsb ?
2. Bagaimana tata cara serah terima hadiah undian, termasuk nota/faktur/invoice yg harus saya bayarkan ke penyelenggara atas nama pajak ?
3. Bagaimana saya bisa memegang janji penyelenggara bahwa uang yg saya bayarkan memang utk kantor pajak ?
4. Lain2.

Terima kasih sebelumnya.

________________________________
Dapatkan alamat Email baru Anda!
Dapatkan nama yang selalu Anda inginkan sebelum diambil orang lain!

___________________________________________________________________________
Dapatkan nama yang Anda sukai!
Sekarang Anda dapat memiliki email di @ymail.com dan @rocketmail.com.
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/id/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[forum-pajak] Re: Tanya NPWP Istri

Saya sudah berusaha mencari peraturan yang menyebutkan bahwa istri
yang bekerja diberikan "kode cabang" 001 pada NPWPnya .... hasilnya
negatif.

Saya pernah menanyakan kepada AR mengenai pemberian kode "001"
kepada istri. Namun jawaban AR ... bahwa istri diberikan kode 001
karena "dianggap" sebagai cabang.

Menurut saya .... dalam sudut pandang hukum, "anggapan" tersebut
sudah tentu sangat lemah dan tidak berdasar. Masak istri kok mau
disamakan dengan kantor cabang. Berbeda kalau hal ini kemudian
dituangkan dalam suatu peraturan. Suka atau tidak, benar atau
tidak ... peraturan sudah dibuat, dan kita harus merujuk kepada
peraturan yang ada.

Demikian tanggapan saya. Terima kasih.

Salam,

--- In forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com, Vaudy Starworld
<vaudy.starworld@...> wrote:
>
> Setau saya untuk kode 001 sudah tidak digunakan dan kembali ke
kode 000 untuk istri yang penghasilan digabung dengan suami.
> Hal ini saya dapat informasi di beberapa KPP di Sulawesi Utara dan
Jakarta, dan setau saya kode istri yang penghasilan digabung dengan
suami belum diatur dengan kode-kodean (maaf bila salah).
> Bahkan di KPP Manado dahulu menggunakan kode 001 sekarang balik
lagi ke 000.
> Mohon bantuan teman-teman Fiskus.
>
> Salam,
> Vaudy Starworld
>
>> ________________________________
> From: imam sudarso <imam_sudarso@...>
> To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2008 5:51:00 AM
> Subject: [forum-pajak] Tanya NPWP Istri
>
>
>
> Selamat Pagi semuanya,
> Saya lagi ada masalah mungkin bisa ada yang bantu!!
> Kalau untuk Istri yang penghasilan suaminya di gabung apakah wajib
punya NPWP sendiri??, Karena di kantor saya seorang istri ada yang
mengajukan permohonan penghapusan NPWP di KPP dengan alasan
penghasilannya digabung dengan penghasilan Suaminya , cuma menurut
orang pajak KPP Gambir di haruskan membuat NPWP sendiri dengan
Nomor NPWP sama dengan NPWP suami kecuali tiga digit di belakang 001,
> Jadi bagaimana ya, apakah seorang istri tersebut wajib memiliki
NPWP sendiri walaupun penghasilannya di gabung dengan suami?
> Sebelumnya saya ucapkan terima kasih dan maaf kalau masalah ini
sudah pernah di bahas
>
>
> Thank's

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [forum-pajak] new comer

dear j,
paling jelas n keliatan, di bidang penginapan, pajak yang akan dihadapi PAJAK HOTEL (daerah), yang biasa-biasa seperti karyawan. khusus untuk transaksi luar negeri tergantung dengan pihak mana kita bertransaksi bisa PPh pasal 26 kalau jelas-jelas pihak tersebut WPLN, atau PPh 23 kalo jelas-jelas WPDN. Jadi tergantung kondisi dan situasi transaksi tsb. maaf kalu belepotan, hanya mencoba membantu.

-estie

________________________________
From: Johan Chrysler <mr.djonathan@yahoo.co.id>
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2008 1:28:04 PM
Subject: [forum-pajak] new comer

dear all,

seorang fresh graduate yang baru saja bekerja di sebuah perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang penginapan. kadang si owner juga bermain dengan saham luar negri.
jenis pajak apa saja yang saya hadapi?

terimakasih untuk jawabannya.. .

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi

yang dimaksud ibu Ranti tarif pajak or tarif iklan durasi 30 detik y?

Proses iklan ada 2 :
1. Pembuatan Materi, biasanya dilakukan oleh PH, tarif pajak 4,5%
2. penayangan iklan di media :
- langsung ke media tarif pajak 1.5%
- melalui agency, agency fee nya yg dipotong 4,5%

kalo tarif iklan sangat bervariasi tergantung letak iklannya pd program apa dan jam penayangannya jg

thx
fs

--- On Thu, 11/6/08, Pribadi Wibowo <PWibowo@bankbii.com> wrote:

From: Pribadi Wibowo <PWibowo@bankbii.com>
Subject: RE: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, November 6, 2008, 2:33 PM

Betul Bu.

Dalam hal, pihak agency dapat melampirkan salinan BP atas pembayaran ke
Media dan salinan bukti pembayaran iklan ke media, sehingga kita dapat
menghitung selisih lebih sebagai jasa agency, maka atas selisih lebih
tersebut dapat dianggap sebagai penghasilan atas jasa perantara dan
dikenakan PPh Pasal 23 sebesar 4,5% (PER-70/PJ/2007) .

IMHO

_____

From: indah mutia [mailto:mutia.imut@yahoo. com]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:15 PM
To: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi

Ikut nimbrung, bagaimana kalau pasang iklan lewat agency yang menarik agency
fee? apakah tarif pph nya atas jasa perantara saja, karena pihak agency
sudah memungut pph atas jasa penyediaan waktu dan tempat di media masa ?

Thx, Mutia

--- On Thu, 10/30/08, heri heri <heriyan_to@ yahoo.
<mailto:heriyan_ to%40yahoo. com> -com> wrote:

From: heri heri <heriyan_to@ yahoo. <mailto:heriyan_ to%40yahoo. com> -com>
Subject: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi
To: forum-pajak@ <mailto:forum- pajak%40yahoogro ups.com> -yahoogroups. -com
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 9:38 AM

PER.70/PJ./2007 yaitu jasa penyediaan tempat dan/atau waktu dalam media
massa, media luar ruang atau median lain untuk penyampaian informasi dengan
tarif efektif 1,5%.

semoga membantu dan mohon koreksi jika salah. terima kasih

____________ _________ _________ __
Dari: Sri Ranti <ranti.z@gmail. com>
Kepada: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com
Terkirim: Kamis, 30 Oktober, 2008 11:27:53
Topik: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi

Dear all,
mohon bantuan nih, ada yang tau ngga peraturan tentang tarif tayangan
televisi, beserta tarif iklannya. karena tempatku bekerja bikin 1
tayangan televisi durasi 30 dan harus dipotong pajaknya. terima

Regards,

Ranti

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
Yahoo! sekarang memiliki alamat Email baru.
Dapatkan nama yang selalu Anda inginkan di domain baru @ymail dan
@rocketmail.
Cepat sebelum diambil orang lain!
http://mail. <http://mail.> promotions. yahoo.com/ newdomains/ id/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

---

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi

yang dimaksud ibu Ranti tarif pajak or tarif iklan per durasi 30 detik?

Iklan ada 2 proses:
1. pembuatan materi iklan, biasanya dilakukan oleh production house tarif pajaknya 4,5%
2. iklan ditayangkan di televisi;
- langsung ke

--- On Thu, 11/6/08, Pribadi Wibowo <PWibowo@bankbii.com> wrote:

From: Pribadi Wibowo <PWibowo@bankbii.com>
Subject: RE: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, November 6, 2008, 2:33 PM

Betul Bu.

IMHO

_____

From: indah mutia [mailto:mutia.imut@yahoo. com]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:15 PM
To: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi

Thx, Mutia

--- On Thu, 10/30/08, heri heri <heriyan_to@ yahoo.
<mailto:heriyan_ to%40yahoo. com> -com> wrote:

PER.70/PJ./2007 yaitu jasa penyediaan tempat dan/atau waktu dalam media
massa, media luar ruang atau median lain untuk penyampaian informasi dengan
tarif efektif 1,5%.

semoga membantu dan mohon koreksi jika salah. terima kasih

Regards,

Ranti

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

---

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi

--- On Thu, 11/6/08, Pribadi Wibowo <PWibowo@bankbii.com> wrote:

From: Pribadi Wibowo <PWibowo@bankbii.com>
Subject: RE: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, November 6, 2008, 2:33 PM

Betul Bu.

IMHO

_____

From: indah mutia [mailto:mutia.imut@yahoo. com]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:15 PM
To: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi

Thx, Mutia

--- On Thu, 10/30/08, heri heri <heriyan_to@ yahoo.
<mailto:heriyan_ to%40yahoo. com> -com> wrote:

PER.70/PJ./2007 yaitu jasa penyediaan tempat dan/atau waktu dalam media
massa, media luar ruang atau median lain untuk penyampaian informasi dengan
tarif efektif 1,5%.

semoga membantu dan mohon koreksi jika salah. terima kasih

Regards,

Ranti

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

---

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi

--- On Thu, 11/6/08, Pribadi Wibowo <PWibowo@bankbii.com> wrote:

From: Pribadi Wibowo <PWibowo@bankbii.com>
Subject: RE: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, November 6, 2008, 2:33 PM

Betul Bu.

IMHO

_____

From: indah mutia [mailto:mutia.imut@yahoo. com]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:15 PM
To: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi

Thx, Mutia

--- On Thu, 10/30/08, heri heri <heriyan_to@ yahoo.
<mailto:heriyan_ to%40yahoo. com> -com> wrote:

PER.70/PJ./2007 yaitu jasa penyediaan tempat dan/atau waktu dalam media
massa, media luar ruang atau median lain untuk penyampaian informasi dengan
tarif efektif 1,5%.

semoga membantu dan mohon koreksi jika salah. terima kasih

Regards,

Ranti

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

---

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi

--- On Thu, 11/6/08, Pribadi Wibowo <PWibowo@bankbii.com> wrote:

From: Pribadi Wibowo <PWibowo@bankbii.com>
Subject: RE: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, November 6, 2008, 2:33 PM

Betul Bu.

IMHO

_____

From: indah mutia [mailto:mutia.imut@yahoo. com]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:15 PM
To: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: Bls: [forum-pajak] tarif pajak tayangan televisi

Thx, Mutia

--- On Thu, 10/30/08, heri heri <heriyan_to@ yahoo.
<mailto:heriyan_ to%40yahoo. com> -com> wrote:

PER.70/PJ./2007 yaitu jasa penyediaan tempat dan/atau waktu dalam media
massa, media luar ruang atau median lain untuk penyampaian informasi dengan
tarif efektif 1,5%.

semoga membantu dan mohon koreksi jika salah. terima kasih

Regards,

Ranti

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

---

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[forum-pajak] Penandatangan SSP kepada pemungut

dear all,

ditempat saya ada transaksi penjualan kepada pihak Depkominfo, sesuai dgn Keputusan Menteri Keuangan No.563/KMK.30/2003, SE-02/PJ.24/2005, SSP ditandatangani oleh Bendaharawan atau KPKN sebagai penyetor, tetapi pihak Depkominfo tidak mau menandatangani SSP tersebut karena menurut Depkominfo SSP harus ditandatangani oleh pihak penjual dengan mengacu pada Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Perbendaharaan PER 66/PB/2005 pada ps.4 "faktur pajak beserta SSP ditandatangani Wajib Pajak"

teman2 punya pengalaman transaksi dengan pemungut? sebenarnya siapakah yg hrs tanda tangan di SSP PPN (PPN setor sendiri oleh pemungut)

thx
fs

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: Bls: [forum-pajak] Tax untuk Chemical Co

PPh Pasal 15 hanya dikenakan kepada perusahaan pelayaran dan penerbangan baik dalam maupun luar negeri serta kantor perwakilan dagang

Regards

Deden Saefudin
http://dedensaefudin.com/?p=64#respond

--- On Wed, 11/5/08, Chandra Dewi <nyanyagh@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Chandra Dewi <nyanyagh@yahoo.com>
Subject: Bls: [forum-pajak] Tax untuk Chemical Co
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, November 5, 2008, 6:37 PM

Iya pak, selain PPH 25,23, 4:2 or PPn, PPh 22 untuk importnya ya pak? ada kewajiban lain ga pak untuk PPh nya misalnya seperti Prsh kertas, oil company yg dikenakan PPh 15. CMIIW

Chandra

____________ _________ _________ __
Dari: winarto sugondo <sugondo.winarto@ gmail.com>
Kepada: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com
Terkirim: Kamis, 6 November, 2008 09:30:58
Topik: Re: [forum-pajak] Tax untuk Chemical Co

Perkataan Pak Deden benar Bu, namun biasanya chemical company juga punya
kewajiban PPh pasal 22, lihat naturalitas pencatatannya saja.

Salam,

Winarto Sugondo

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Deden Saefudin <deden041@yahoo. com> wrote:

> Pertanyaan Pak Chandra masih terlalu umum, mungkin lebih baik jika dalam
> bentuk kasus supaya rekan2 milis bisa membantunya.
> Secara umum, sama dengan jenis usaha lainnya
> 1. Untuk badan hukumnya. PPh dikenakan atas laba usahanya
> 2. Untuk withholding tax nya, seperti PPh 21 (penghasilan kepada WP OP
> dalam negeri), PPh 23 (penghasilan atas bunga, royalti, sewa harta selain
> tanah dan bangunan, dividen dan jasa-jasa tertentu), dst..
>
> Regards
>
> Deden Saefudin
> dedensaefudin. com
>
> --- On Tue, 11/4/08, Chandra Dewi <nyanyagh@yahoo. com<nyanyagh% 40yahoo. com>>
> wrote:
>
> From: Chandra Dewi <nyanyagh@yahoo. com <nyanyagh%40yahoo. com>>
> Subject: [forum-pajak] Tax untuk Chemical Co
> To: "Forum Pajak" <forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com<forum-pajak% 40yahoogroups. com>
> >
> Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2008, 5:15 PM
>
>
> Temans,
> untuk perusahaan chemical... berhubungan dengan PPh berapa aja ya?...
> Terima kasih informasinya
>
> Chandra
>
> ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> Dapatkan nama yang Anda sukai!
> Sekarang Anda dapat memiliki email di @ymail.com dan @rocketmail. com.
> http://mail. promotions. yahoo.com/ newdomains/ id/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Coba Yahoo! Messenger baru

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[forum-pajak] Tanya Nota retur atas penjualan space ruangan

Dear All para Pakar Pajak,

Saya mau tanya mengenai penjualan space ruangan perkantoran, apabila terjadi pembatalan atas transaksi penjualan tersebut dimana cicilan pembayaran telah dilakukan sejak tahun 2007, apakah diperbolehkan menggunakan nota retur atas pembatalan transaksi tersebut?

Thks & Rgds,
Rin

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [forum-pajak] new comer

Dear Johan
Pertanyaannya masih belum jelas tuh. Seorang fresh graduate itu WNI apa WNA? Kalo WNA sudah brp lama tinggal di Indonesia. Terus yang ditanyakan pajak pribadi atau pajak badan (penginapan)?

--- On Thu, 11/6/08, Johan Chrysler <mr.djonathan@yahoo.co.id> wrote:
From: Johan Chrysler <mr.djonathan@yahoo.co.id>
Subject: [forum-pajak] new comer
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, November 6, 2008, 6:28 AM

dear all,

seorang fresh graduate yang baru saja bekerja di sebuah perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang penginapan. kadang si owner juga bermain dengan saham luar negri.

jenis pajak apa saja yang saya hadapi?

terimakasih untuk jawabannya.. .

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [forum-pajak] Tanya NPWP Istri - liat Per 44/2008

ternyata sudah keluar Per 44 Tahun 2008 mengenai istri dengan status tidak pisah harta.
Silahkan mempelajari lagi.

Salam,
Vaudy Starworld

________________________________
From: Vaudy Starworld <vaudy..starworld@yahoo.com>
To: forum-pajak@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2008 10:25:59 AM
Subject: Re: [forum-pajak] Tanya NPWP Istri

Setau saya untuk kode 001 sudah tidak digunakan dan kembali ke kode 000 untuk istri yang penghasilan digabung dengan suami.
Hal ini saya dapat informasi di beberapa KPP di Sulawesi Utara dan Jakarta, dan setau saya kode istri yang penghasilan digabung dengan suami belum diatur dengan kode-kodean (maaf bila salah).
Bahkan di KPP Manado dahulu menggunakan kode 001 sekarang balik lagi ke 000.
Mohon bantuan teman-teman Fiskus.

Salam,
Vaudy Starworld

____________ _________ _________ __
From: imam sudarso <imam_sudarso@ yahoo.com>
To: forum-pajak@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2008 5:51:00 AM
Subject: [forum-pajak] Tanya NPWP Istri

Selamat Pagi semuanya,
Saya lagi ada masalah mungkin bisa ada yang bantu!!
Kalau untuk Istri yang penghasilan suaminya di gabung apakah wajib punya NPWP sendiri??, Karena di kantor saya seorang istri ada yang mengajukan permohonan penghapusan NPWP di KPP dengan alasan penghasilannya digabung dengan penghasilan Suaminya , cuma menurut orang pajak KPP Gambir di haruskan membuat NPWP sendiri dengan Nomor NPWP sama dengan NPWP suami kecuali tiga digit di belakang 001,
Jadi bagaimana ya, apakah seorang istri tersebut wajib memiliki NPWP sendiri walaupun penghasilannya di gabung dengan suami?
Sebelumnya saya ucapkan terima kasih dan maaf kalau masalah ini sudah pernah di bahas

Thank's

Get your new Email address!
Grab the Email name you've always wanted before someone else does!
http://mail. promotions. yahoo.com/ newdomains/ aa/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: [taxchat] Early withdrawal from ROTH

My understanding is that if you are under 59 ½ and you started contributing five years before you take the money out, you can take your original investment but you pay taxes on the earnings. After 59 ½ you can take it and not pay any tax.

Debbie Wilson

From: taxchat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:taxchat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Robert Lukey
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 5:45 PM
To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [taxchat] Early withdrawal from ROTH

That's what I had been thinking. So since there was more then 5 yrs I don't even need to use Form 5329. I believe I was thinking to hard. Thanks for your response.

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Arnold M. Socol <waymeans@verizon.net> wrote:

I believe If ROTH a/c is 5 or more years old there is no penalty.

----- Original Message -----

From: Robert Lukey

To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com

Sent: 11/06/2008 3:29 PM

Subject: [taxchat] Early withdrawal from ROTH

I have a client who made an early withdrawal from their ROTH in 2006. Now I'm preparing their return. I'm confusing myself on this as I don't believe that there is any tax but I believe there is a penalty for early withdrawal. I seem to be missing something on the form 5329 that will let me enter what's needed there. I've never worked with an early withdrawal before.

--
Robert Lukey EA CPA

__._,_.___

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this transmission, any tax advice contained herein, forwarded with or attached to this message was not and is not intended to be used, nor may it be relied upon or used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) the avoidance of any tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax transaction or tax-related matters that may be addressed herein.

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[forum-pajak] Perbedaan tarif 100% lebih tinggi bagi yang tidak punya NPWP

Sahabat-sahabat senafas dan sejiwa di forum pajak dan tax ina,

Mau konfirmasi aja karena saya masih newbie dlm perpajakan.
Seperti diketahui bahwa berdasarkan UU No.36 Th. 2008 untuk Pasal 22 ayat 3 dan Pasal 26 telah diatur untuk WP yang tidak ber NPWP akan dikenakan PPh 100% lebih tinggi dari tarif normal.
Untuk PPh Ps.26 tidak disebutkan perbedaan tarif antara yang berNPWP dan tidak, ini masih logis karena WP yang dipotong PPh PS.26 bukan residen Indonesia.
Untuk PPh yang lainnya, misalkan Ps. 4(2) dan PPh Ps.15 kenapa tidak diatur perbedaan tarif ini ? padahal kalau menurut saya, bagi mereka yang tidak berNPWP juga mestinya dikenakan PPh 100% lebih tinggi seperti halnya diatur dlm PPh Ps.22 dan 23?

Demikian, atas jawaban dan perhatian teman-teman semua para pakar pajak Indonesia, saya ucapkan terima kasih

Salam
Jagalah hati selalu

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

============================================

PERHATIAN
Dalam me-reply email, hapuslah bagian email yang tidak diperlukan termasuk DISCLAIMER dibawah ini.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forum-pajak/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:forum-pajak-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:forum-pajak-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
forum-pajak-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [taxchat] Early withdrawal from ROTH

That's what I had been thinking. So since there was more then 5 yrs I don't even need to use Form 5329. I believe I was thinking to hard. Thanks for your response.

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Arnold M. Socol <waymeans@verizon.net> wrote:

I believe If ROTH a/c is 5 or more years old there is no penalty.

----- Original Message -----

From: Robert Lukey

To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com

Sent: 11/06/2008 3:29 PM

Subject: [taxchat] Early withdrawal from ROTH

I have a client who made an early withdrawal from their ROTH in 2006. Now I'm preparing their return. I'm confusing myself on this as I don't believe that there is any tax but I believe there is a penalty for early withdrawal. I seem to be missing something on the form 5329 that will let me enter what's needed there. I've never worked with an early withdrawal before.

--
Robert Lukey EA CPA

-- __._,_.___

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this transmission, any tax advice contained herein, forwarded with or attached to this message was not and is not intended to be used, nor may it be relied upon or used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) the avoidance of any tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax transaction or tax-related matters that may be addressed herein.

__,_._,___

Re: [taxchat] Early withdrawal from ROTH

I believe If ROTH a/c is 5 or more years old there is no penalty.

----- Original Message -----

From: Robert Lukey

To: taxchat@yahoogroups.com

Sent: 11/06/2008 3:29 PM

Subject: [taxchat] Early withdrawal from ROTH

I have a client who made an early withdrawal from their ROTH in 2006. Now I'm preparing their return. I'm confusing myself on this as I don't believe that there is any tax but I believe there is a penalty for early withdrawal. I seem to be missing something on the form 5329 that will let me enter what's needed there. I've never worked with an early withdrawal before.

--
Robert Lukey EA CPA

__,_._,___

[taxchat] Early withdrawal from ROTH

I have a client who made an early withdrawal from their ROTH in 2006. Now I'm preparing their return. I'm confusing myself on this as I don't believe that there is any tax but I believe there is a penalty for early withdrawal. I seem to be missing something on the form 5329 that will let me enter what's needed there. I've never worked with an early withdrawal before.

--
Robert Lukey EA CPA __._,_.___

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this transmission, any tax advice contained herein, forwarded with or attached to this message was not and is not intended to be used, nor may it be relied upon or used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) the avoidance of any tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax transaction or tax-related matters that may be addressed herein.

__,_._,___

Re: [taxchat] Why Did the Chicken Cross the Road ? (NEW VERSION)

Yup?

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:57 PM, JoJo Zawawi <kuchekesha@earthlink.net> wrote:

WHY DID THE CHICKEN CROSS THE ROAD?

BARACK OBAMA: The chicken crossed the road because it was time for change!
The chicken wanted change!

JOHN MCCAIN: My friends, that chicken crossed the road because he was a
maverick chicken, and he wanted to engage in cooperation and dialogue with
all the chickens on the other side of the road.

SARAH PALIN: The chicken had to cross the road because he was not able to
find a bridge. Alaskans do not build bridges to nowhere. If he wanted a
bridge, he'd have to build it himself.

JOE BIDEN: The chicken crossed the road because he was heading back to
Scranton.

HILLARY CLINTON: When I was First Lady, I personally helped that little
chicken cross the road. This experience makes me uniquely qualified to
ensure right from Day One that every chicken in this country gets the chance
it deserves to cross the road. But then, this really isn't about me.

GEORGE W. BUSH: We don't really care why the chicken crossed the road. We
just want to know if the chicken is on our side of the road, or not. The
chicken is either for us or against us. There is no middle ground here.

DICK CHENEY: Where's my gun?

COLIN POWELL: Now, to the left of the screen, you can clearly see the
satellite image of the chicken crossing the road.

BILL CLINTON: I did not cross the road with that chicken. What is your
definition of chicken?

AL GORE: I invented the chicken.

JOHN KERRY: Although I voted to let the chicken cross the road, I am now
against it! It was the wrong road to cross, and I was misled about the
chicken's intentions. I am not for it now, and will remain against it.

AL SHARPTON: Why are all the chickens white? We need some black chickens.

DR. PHIL: The problem we have here is that this chicken won't realize that
he must first deal with the problem on this side of the road before it goes
after the problem on the other side of the road. What we need to do is help
him realize how stupid he's acting by not taking on his current problems
before adding new problems.

OPRAH: Well, I understand that the chicken is having problems, which is why
he wants to cross this road so bad. So instead of having the chicken learn
from his mistakes and take falls, which is a part of life, I'm going to give
this chicken a car so that he can just drive across the road and not live
his life like the rest of the chickens.

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN: We have reason to believe there is a chicken, but we
have not yet been allowed to have access to the other side of the road.

MARTHA STEWART: No one called me to warn me which way that chicken was
going. I had a standing order at the Farmer's Market to sell my eggs when
the price dropped to a certain level. No little bird gave me any insider
information.

DR SEUSS: Did the chicken cross the road? Did he cross it with a toad?
Yes, the chicken crossed the road, but why it crossed I've not been told.

ERNEST HEMINGWAY: To die in the rain, alone.

GRANDPA: In my day we didn't ask why the chicken crossed the road.
Somebody told us the chicken crossed the road, and that was good enough.

BARBARA WALTERS: Isn't that interesting? In a few moments, we will be
listening to the chicken tell, for the first time, the heart warming story
of how it experienced a serious case of molting, and went on to accomplish
its lifelong dream of crossing the road.

ARISTOTLE: It is the nature of chickens to cross the road.

JOHN LENNON: Imagine all the chickens in the world crossing roads together,
in peace.

BILL GATES: I have just released eChicken2008, which will not only cross
roads, but will lay eggs, file your important documents, and balance your
checkbook. Internet Explorer is an integral part of eChicken2008. This new
platform is much more stable and will never reboot.

ALBERT EINSTEIN: Did the chicken really cross the road, or did the road
move beneath the chicken?

COLONEL SANDERS: Did I miss one?

-- // --

__,_._,___

06 November 2008

Arsip Blog